At WSU, opportunities abound for students to
pursue independent research-from independent study courses, to university
grants and WSUSA Summer Research Fellowship Programs. When writing a
grant proposal for an independent research project, you should keep the
following tips in mind. And for further assistance, consult with your
professors, visit Dr. John Cavitt in the Office of Undergraduate Research or
make an appointment with the Writing Center.
Part I. Formulation
Early development can be key to the success
of your proposal. Before you begin writing, think critically about your
project.
Tip #1:Choose a good topic.
Your faculty mentor should help you to narrow
and clarify your topic, so that your proposal is specific, focused and more
importantly, manageable. The best research topic, however, will be the one
you're most excited about. If you aren't fascinated and galvanized by your
research topic, your readers won't be excited either.
Tip #2:Do your preliminary research.
Read widely in your subject area before you begin writing. Become familiar with
the field, its principal issues, and major contributors. Put together an
annotated bibliography. Consider what contribution your research will make. By
the time you sit down to write your proposal, you should know what you want to
research, but you should not yet be trying to synthesize your research.
Tip #3:Envision the final product.
Your project should result in a concrete final product, such as a written
investigative report, or a creative work. Although you cannot fully anticipate
what final form your project will take, it is important to have a vision of
what it might be. If your project is an activity of some kind, devise a method
to document it so that the committee will have concrete evidence of your work.
Part II. Composition
Writing the proposal is often the most
difficult component of a research project. Be prepared: give yourself enough
time to write, rewrite, and revise.
Tip #4:Brainstorm, brainstorm, brainstorm!
Talk to friends, family, and faculty to clarify your ideas. Schedule a
"pre-draft" advising session in the Office of Undergraduate Research.
Freewrite as a way of getting your ideas on paper. Get your ideas down first;
then think about how to organize them!
Tip #5:Study successful proposals.
The Office of Undergraduate Research keeps copies of successful Grant
proposals. Browse through the files, and copy two or three proposals on topics
similar to yours. Study them carefully to get ideas for ways of presenting your
project.
Tip #6:Be specific.
Take time to consider your research methods and plan a budget. Don't just guess
and say, "Trip to Alaska: $500." Get online travel quotes for a
realistic estimate on airline tickets, accommodations, and other expenses.
Approach your methodology and research timeline in the same way; if you need to
make adjustments later, you can. It is important, though, that you convince the
committee that not only is your project doable-you've figured out how to do it.
Part III. Revision
Revision is critical. Don't expect to write
one draft of your proposal and be awarded a grant. A good proposal will take
several revisions; be sure to give yourself time.
Tip #7:Be concise and organized.
Clearly differentiate the various parts of the proposal. For instance, in your
methodology section, talk only about your methodology. Leave out extraneous
information.
Tip #8:Be clear.
The awards committee consists of faculty from a variety of academic
disciplines. Your proposal should not be so discipline-specific and
jargon-laden that outside readers won't understand. On the other hand, don't
dumb your language down so that you insult the educated reader. If necessary,
the committee will ask a specialist for an opinion on the project's viability.
As you revise, consult a variety of readers, both in your discipline and
outside it.
Part IV. Editing
Reread your proposal several times before
submitting to the committee.
Tip #9:Avoid errors.
Because errors are easily introduced during the revision process, be sure to
reread your text carefully each time you make changes. There is no excuse for
grammatical and spelling errors in a grant proposal. Use spell checker by all
means, but don't rely on it completely. There's no substitute for careful
proofreading.
Tip #10:Make it professional.
Take some time to format your proposal neatly, with headings and sub-headings
where appropriate. A good layout is easier on the eyes of committee members who
will be reading many proposals. Word of warning: don't go cutesy, with
bright-colored paper and fancy fonts.
There you have it: ten tips to help you write
a successful grant proposal. But keep in mind-even if you do everything right,
there's still an element of luck. In the world of grant applications, your
chances of success depend also on the number and quality of proposals in your
subject area. If your proposal isn't accepted, don't view it as a personal
attack on your research abilities or your topic. If your project is viable,
look for funding from another source.
How
to NOT get Funded
Perhaps
the best way to understand what makes a good Grant or Fellowship application is
to imagine a very bad one. Unsuccessful applications often share these
characteristics:
Poorly Written
A poorly written proposal speaks volumes
about its author. Your proposal should be a flawless example of your very best writing.
Your writing should be clear, articulate, and free of spelling and grammar
mistakes.
Inadequately Researched
It may seem ironic that you should begin
research even before you apply for a Grant or Fellowship, but applicants who
can demonstrate a broad familiarity with their subject, have researched the
relevant literature, and who can provide a brief review of this literature,
will generally produce a more substantive and persuasive proposal.
Not Written to the Audience
The WSU Undergraduate Research Grants
committee is a faculty committee; your proposal will be read by scholars from
various disciplines, who all have experience conducting research and writing
grant proposals.
Proposal Written by the Faculty Mentor
The WSU Undergraduate Research Grants
committee consists of faculty that have many years experience evaluating
written student work. Proposals that have been written by a faculty
mentor are obvious and won't be funded.
Lukewarm or Unenthusiastic Mentor
Unfortunately, if a mentor's recommendation
falls short of enthusiasm, or conveys the impression that the mentor doesn't
really support the project or the student, it will affect how the committee
views the proposal. Pick your mentor carefully; solicit her or his advice in
drafting and rewriting your proposal.
Isn't Significant
A research project should result in a
definable product that "makes a contribution"-to your field of
study.
Projects should have a clear, definable
research question.
Isn't Feasible
Projects should be well conceived and doable.
A
Holiday Excursion
Each year the WSU Undergraduate Research
Grants committee reads proposals that involve travel, some to far-off, exotic
locales. Where the applicant can demonstrate that the travel is necessary to
successfully executing the project-interviewing Okinawans about the U.S.
military presence on their island; reading the work of Cuban playwrights in a
Havana library-the grant is more likely to be funded. Ask yourself: could this
project be done somewhere else? Is a trip to Paris really necessary? (not just
desirable).
Mistakes Assertion for Proof or Evidence
Just stating that "I can do this
project" or "this project will get done" is not enough to sway
the committee.
*Modified from the Willamete University
Collaborative Research Program